ASIGNMENT 23:: MERCHANT OF VENICE ANTICIPATION GUIDE
1:46 AM
Love is Blind:
I agree with this statement because, love (both romantically and not) are capable to blind someone from seeing the bigger picture. Based on my observations on people partaking in a relationship a lot of the time their mind is consumed with thoughts pertaining to their spouse. A majority of the time, it ends up stashing away any academic related thoughts away which makes their grades go downhill.
One of my closest friend entered their first relationship and when they did a majority of of the time was spent with their spouse and, minimum time was used for academic purposes. Because, they were in 'love' it coerced them to leave their responsibilities to spend time or fantasizing about their significant other.
Another example is the quote, “We accept the love we think we deserve,” from the story ‘Perks of Being A WallFlower.’ There are many interpretations on this quote however, I related it to victims of abusive relationships. A lot of the time victims of such relationships believed that this harmful 'love' was the one that they deserved and, also felt loved. The love they thought they deserved made them blind to the degrading acts that were conducted on them.
To conclude, love is blind.
Stereotypes are often right:
I disagree with this statement because, stereotypes are caricatures of representations for races. They are two-dimensional characters that are used to generalize an entire race. It is bigoted to believe that most people belonging to a certain race follow these stereotypes - when a race is comprised of varying personalities, looks, voices, etc.
For example, a common stereotype is that Asians are unable to speak ‘proper’ English however, many Asians who reside in English speaking countries are able to speak English to their standards of what proper English is. Furthermore, there's a stereotype on Asian peoples’ eyes. The term 'Asian Eyes' refer to small eyes that are deemed as undesirable because, they are not what society considers beautiful. So, whenever someone plasters a big smile and their eyes become smaller, this term would be used to describe that look. This is a stereotype that is wrong because, Asia is a huge continent comprised of varying countries with different looks, voices, cultures, etc. So, to stereotype that all Asians have one eye look is wrong because there are many different eye appearances in Asia.
Stereotypes are often right:
I disagree with this statement because, stereotypes are caricatures of representations for races. They are two-dimensional characters that are used to generalize an entire race. It is bigoted to believe that most people belonging to a certain race follow these stereotypes - when a race is comprised of varying personalities, looks, voices, etc.
For example, a common stereotype is that Asians are unable to speak ‘proper’ English however, many Asians who reside in English speaking countries are able to speak English to their standards of what proper English is. Furthermore, there's a stereotype on Asian peoples’ eyes. The term 'Asian Eyes' refer to small eyes that are deemed as undesirable because, they are not what society considers beautiful. So, whenever someone plasters a big smile and their eyes become smaller, this term would be used to describe that look. This is a stereotype that is wrong because, Asia is a huge continent comprised of varying countries with different looks, voices, cultures, etc. So, to stereotype that all Asians have one eye look is wrong because there are many different eye appearances in Asia.
I do acknowledge the opposing argument is that stereotypes are born through empirical observations which proves why stereotypes are often right. However, that is not the way stereotypes are born but through a generalization of something is made mainstream by the media. For example, Hawaii gained the media’s attention by white people using grass skirts and coconut bras to represent hula girls. After this occurred, it educated the public on a caricature of what a hula girl is like however, because this gained fame many people started to associate a hula girl with coconut bras and a grass skirt. But, there are people within a certain race that do abide by their stereotypes but, does it speak for all people pertaining to that certain race? No. To conclude, stereotypes are often wrong.
A sibling bond between two friends can be just as strong as an intimate/romantic relationship.
Although, I have not been apart of a romantic relationship, I am able to form my opinion through observations.
Agree. A sibling bond can be just as powerful as an intimate relationship because, both are under an umbrella entitled as love however, they are their own sub category. In a sibling bond it involves a lot of trust, reliance, and of course love. Likewise, romantic relationships contain the same emotions. These feelings are cultivated into strong relationships and, because of that they are equal. To illustrate, my sister and I share a powerful bond with each other because, we are able to trust, rely, and love each other for who we are. But, my sister is also in a romantic relationship of 4 years and they are also able to do the same things my sister and I share. In addition, my sister confessed to me that she loves me on the same level as her spouse (actually she said she loved me more) - but, the point is that because both are capable of executing those three emotions which is what makes it equal to each other.
You can break a promise as long as you have a good excuse
Agree. You are able to break a promise through justification. Some promises that are made can endanger the other party is so, it is perfectly reasonable for the party to break it if it is for the greater good. For example, when people marry to each other they vow to be together however, if their relationship goes downhill then, it is okay to break that promise if one or both parties are unhappy. As long as there is just reasoning and good intentions then, it is ok to break a promise.
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth is a good motto to live by.
A sibling bond between two friends can be just as strong as an intimate/romantic relationship.
Although, I have not been apart of a romantic relationship, I am able to form my opinion through observations.
Agree. A sibling bond can be just as powerful as an intimate relationship because, both are under an umbrella entitled as love however, they are their own sub category. In a sibling bond it involves a lot of trust, reliance, and of course love. Likewise, romantic relationships contain the same emotions. These feelings are cultivated into strong relationships and, because of that they are equal. To illustrate, my sister and I share a powerful bond with each other because, we are able to trust, rely, and love each other for who we are. But, my sister is also in a romantic relationship of 4 years and they are also able to do the same things my sister and I share. In addition, my sister confessed to me that she loves me on the same level as her spouse (actually she said she loved me more) - but, the point is that because both are capable of executing those three emotions which is what makes it equal to each other.
You can break a promise as long as you have a good excuse
Agree. You are able to break a promise through justification. Some promises that are made can endanger the other party is so, it is perfectly reasonable for the party to break it if it is for the greater good. For example, when people marry to each other they vow to be together however, if their relationship goes downhill then, it is okay to break that promise if one or both parties are unhappy. As long as there is just reasoning and good intentions then, it is ok to break a promise.
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth is a good motto to live by.
Disagree. In my perspective, this is not a good motto to live by because, it can only pave the road for a life of resentment and anger. By always repaying a dirty deed to the other party can take its toll on a person because, of the constant pursuit of revenge. Based o my observations people who ere forgiving lived a more happier, comfortable life whereas, people who abide by this motto were more angrier and uncomfortable with life. For example, whenever I am placed in a bad group I used to feel as if I had to go through any means to make sure they did not get the grade that I received supposing I got a good score (actually even now I still carry this feeling). I would feel very burdened because, I made it my absolute mission to ensure that they were not going to get the same score as me when they did minimal work. However, I’m not saying to let every dirty deed be exempted but, rather to not have such a vengeful mindset for it will lead to a not so good life.
Don’t rely on outward appearances when making judgments.
Disagree. I feel that outward appearances are a poor way of making judgements because, I believe that the reasons behind their actions are a reliable way of making a verdict on somebody. For example, in the book, ‘Of Mice and Men,’ a character named as Curley’s wife was thought as flirtatious and easygoing based on the way they presented themselves. However, as the story progressed Curley’s wife explains why she presented herself in that way was because, she was lonely and later on she also unveiled her past on her broken dreams. This moment reveals Curley’s wife to be lonely and heartbroken through justification of her actions. Therefore, to depend on outward appearances is not good judgement.
Justice is always blind.
Agree/disagree. In this age, I wouldn’t say that justice is blind but, blurred. There are many injustices that have not received the proper consequences for example, Kesha’s rapist producer did not receive their punishment and was free of charges. The reason being was rape culture. Rape culture is victim blaming but, a more better phrase is ‘rapist before victim.’ In this case, the verdict of the producer being free was made because, Kesha acted frivolously according to the DailyNYNews. Because of rape culture being perpetuated it blurred the justification for this crime which should be arrest with being exempt because, of Kesha’s ‘frivolous acts’. However, justice is not completely blind because, there are movements for Kesha's justice known as #freekesha, and many other activist groups that strive for justice to be served and other great ideals. But, as long as evil acts are exempted from their charges justice will not be clear but, blurred.
Don’t rely on outward appearances when making judgments.
Disagree. I feel that outward appearances are a poor way of making judgements because, I believe that the reasons behind their actions are a reliable way of making a verdict on somebody. For example, in the book, ‘Of Mice and Men,’ a character named as Curley’s wife was thought as flirtatious and easygoing based on the way they presented themselves. However, as the story progressed Curley’s wife explains why she presented herself in that way was because, she was lonely and later on she also unveiled her past on her broken dreams. This moment reveals Curley’s wife to be lonely and heartbroken through justification of her actions. Therefore, to depend on outward appearances is not good judgement.
Justice is always blind.
Agree/disagree. In this age, I wouldn’t say that justice is blind but, blurred. There are many injustices that have not received the proper consequences for example, Kesha’s rapist producer did not receive their punishment and was free of charges. The reason being was rape culture. Rape culture is victim blaming but, a more better phrase is ‘rapist before victim.’ In this case, the verdict of the producer being free was made because, Kesha acted frivolously according to the DailyNYNews. Because of rape culture being perpetuated it blurred the justification for this crime which should be arrest with being exempt because, of Kesha’s ‘frivolous acts’. However, justice is not completely blind because, there are movements for Kesha's justice known as #freekesha, and many other activist groups that strive for justice to be served and other great ideals. But, as long as evil acts are exempted from their charges justice will not be clear but, blurred.
0 comments